MORE ON MOORE: Slate's review of Fahrenheit 9/11 is pretty good. By which I mean, it confirms my existing beliefs about its subject. That is, I believe, the going blogospheric definition of "good". But it includes this somewhat odd line:

Needless to say, Fahrenheit 9/11 never waffles. The liberals' The Passion of the Christ, it ascribes only the most venal motives to the other side.

The "other side" in TOPTC is, y'know, Satan. Is David Edelstein saying that Gibson's film should give him the benefit of the doubt?