JUST SO'S WE'RE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE, I want to clear up any doubt as to whether my "consanguinosexual marriage" piece from earlier was meant as some kind arguing-in-bad-faith attempt to discredit today's SCoMa decision on same-sex marriage (kind of like a wind-baggier version of what John Derbyshire does here). It wasn't. It was part semi-academic exercise exploring the principles of law as they've been set down, part kidding around, and part serious attempt to get people to consider the interests of a small, and generally ill-regarded sexual minority. That's all, folks. (And no, this post itself is not made in bad faith. The whole damn blog is written in good faith, ok people?)